When Walking is Bad for You

Walking is one of the most rewarding forms of exercise, physically, mentally and spiritually. You can walk and pray, you can walk and socialize with a walking buddy. You can strengthen the body, heart and mind. It’s inexpensive and handy—just lace up those walking shoes, step outside and hit the road.

So, with all of these phenomenal benefits, why would I say that there might be a reason for when you shouldn’t walk?

Today I’m going to cover one big one.

You need to rethink walking for exercise if you are an urban dweller.

 

A 2016 University of Cambridge study published in Preventive Magazine indicated that the benefits of walking in polluted city air far outweighed the negatives. But they used a computerized health model, not real people for their research.

Now a new study published in The Lancet, one of the world’s oldest and best-known, peer-reviewed medical journals, suggests that where you choose to walk does matter.

 

What happens when you walk those city streets—

Researchers found that walking along heavily polluted streets does cancel out many of walking’s benefits.

The researchers gathered 119 people, all over the age of 60. Of this group, 40 of them were considered healthy, 40 had diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is a chronic inflammatory lung disease, and 39 had ischemic heart disease, a condition caused by artery narrowing that reduces blood flow and oxygenation to the tissues.

Then the researchers gave them their walking assignments. Some were instructed to walk two hours a day along London’s Oxford Street, a downtown road heavily traversed by buses and cars. The other group spent two hours strolling through a quiet part of London’s Hyde Park.

After each workout, the researchers measured the pollution concentration in each location and then measured the following health markers in the participants:

  • lung capacity
  • breathlessness
  • wheezing
  • coughing
  • arterial stiffness (related to high blood pressure).

 

What do you think the researchers discovered?

If you think that walking in Hyde Park allowed the walkers to experience better health, you’d be partially right. Actually, they experienced big improvements in lung capacity and arterial stiffness.

After the participants walked along Oxford Street, inhaling its air pollutants, they experienced modest improvements in their lung capacity, but they experienced a worsening of arterial stiffness. Those findings led the researchers to suggest that the poor air quality negated many of walking’s benefits.

 

What about the COPD walkers? While they did experience some lung capacity improvements during their walks in both locations, the researchers considered the improvement to be negligible.

But the walkers with COPD demonstrated more respiratory issues, like coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath, after walking Oxford Street. They also ended up with more arterial stiffness.

The walkers with heart disease also suffered in the polluted urban environment. Unless they were taking cardiovascular drugs, which appeared to offer some protection against the bad air, they suffered more severe arterial stiffness.

Kian Fan Chung, lead researcher and professor of respiratory medicine at Imperial College London’s National Heart and Lung Institute, said, “You should avoid polluted areas for doing any form of exercise, specifically walking.” He added that if an outdoor, less-polluted green space is not available, then you should probably exercise indoors.

And I think even suburban dwellers need to think carefully about when and where they walk around their neighborhoods.

 

 

Case Study—

Within the last thirteen months, I’ve suffered and recovered from a decent bout of pneumonia and been diagnosed with lung nodules. Not large enough yet to be considered cancerous, but still there, and disconcerting. My once clean lungs have caused me to rethink, re-plan, and re-execute my neighborhood-walking program.

After trying both late afternoon and morning walking programs, I’ve discovered the times people are usually leaving for work, which means I get to inhale a lot of carbon monoxide fumes and burned gasoline byproducts if I walk when they drive. I usually end up feeling worse when I arrive home. And I cough a lot.

So when the weather was cooler, I’d wait until after 9:00 AM to walk, or walk around 3:00, before the coming-home rush. That worked well for several months.

But now it’s HOT, and I can’t handle walking in the blazing inferno here in Tucson. (I’m a beach babe by design, not a desert rat.) So I needed to alter my walking times again.

On the weekend, the engineer and I roll out of bed at 4:30 AM, get dressed and drive to a local mountain to walk while the sun’s rising and for about an hour after it starts warming up the desert floor. At a 2.25 mph pace (this mountain’s grade is STEEP!), we can do the 2.9 miles up and back in about an hour and twenty minutes. But now we’re walking up, back, up halfway and then back down to increase our mileage and stamina for our hike over the Pyrenees for our Camino pilgrimage.

On weekdays, we’ve switched to strapping on our headlamps and walking at night around our neighborhood. We’ve discovered that garden spiders are nocturnal and have the most glorious, prism-like eyeballs that reflect our light beams! Sometimes we even catch cottontail bunnies or a pack rat enjoying the cooler night air. And we can also see the airborne dust particles floating across the light beams. We’re stunned at how much dust floats around us that we never see! But it’s a truly lovely time of day to walk.

But when it’s windy here and the dust is really flying, I head to the gym to walk on a treadmill. I’m allergic to dust (really), and it’s one of the environmental issues that will clog up my respiratory track and flatten me within hours. This year, thank the Lord, is the first time in three or four springs that I have NOT succumbed to dust-triggered bronchitis or pneumonia!

I think my new training plan is reaping benefits!

 

 

How about you?

Where and when do you usually walk (run or bike), and is it a potential health hazard for you?

Would it be possible for you to drive to a green belt location or park to walk instead of walking vehicle-clogged city streets?

Start monitoring your breathing after walking in different environments, and maybe measuring your blood pressure.

 

NEXT WEEK: More on walking, and finding green space to enjoy it!

Until then,

Happy walking, wherever it may be!

Andrea

May you prosper in all things and be in health, just as your soul prospers (3 John 2).

Photos courtesy of Google Images

Mover and Shaker in Human History Worldview—Karl Marx

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary lists a variety of definitions for philosophy, depending on what you’re referencing. For our purposes, it lists three definitions:

  1. pursuit of wisdom
  2. 2. a search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculativerather than observational means
  3. an analysis of the grounds of and concepts expressing fundamental beliefs

 

After reading those definitions, my first question is: What is wisdom? How is that defined?

So, I headed over to wisdom and found several definitions.

  1.   a: ability to discern inner qualities and relationships : insight

   b : good sense : judgment

   c : generally accepted belief

   d : accumulated philosophical or scientific learning : knowledge

2: a wise attitude, belief, or course of action

3: the teachings of the ancient wise men

 

After thinking about these defintions, I came to the conclusion that philosophers—for the most part, although some venture into the testable and observable realm—are people who seek to understand inner qualities and relationships through a search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative means. (The chiefly speculative means grabs my attention. Why? Because I don’t think we need to speculate. But we’ll venture into that discussion in a future post!)

They also analyze the grounds of and concepts expressing fundamental beliefs. And many of them are quick to dismiss some of those grounds and concepts and replace them with their own theories and beliefs about people’s behaviors and attitudes, and how to make the thoughts and behaviors right.

 

The term philosophy was first used by Pythagoras, the Greek mathematician and philosopher who invented the famous Pythagorean mathematical theorem. He also founded the Pythagoreanism movement. Interestingly, people considered it a religion. Pythagoras believed in the divinity and immortality of the soul, which—on Earth—is imprisoned in a human form. (We started to discuss that belief in last Friday’s discussion about the soul.)

 

20th Century Philosophy—

The 20th Century saw a development of a large number of new philosophy schools. Many of them came and quickly vaporized. Some are still being practiced and clung to. thefamouspeople.com site contains a litany of people regarded as modern philosophers. I stopped counting at 147.

thebestschools.org lists their top 50 most influential living philosophers. Reading through their overviews is enough to make your eyes cross and your head ache.

But it’s educational, and eye opening. A cursory read of some of these philosophers’ beliefs gives you tremendous insight into what and how much of our society thinks in 2018; and how political beliefs fall into the field of social science.

And as I’m reading these most influential thinkers, I’m thinking, Me thinks you think too much! What a waste of time, and precious mental real estate.

You could, as these highly (and probably over-educated) people do, spend a lifetime posing questions about life and get no closer to solving the world’s human condition. While some of their thinking and work seem practical, much of it sounds, well, silly, and way too irrelevant for the common person.

 

Returning to the 19th Century—

But all we need to do is go back one more century to find a man who may have had one of the most profound, far-reaching and permanent influences on society.

Karl Marx.

Born in Germany in 1818, Marx wore a lot of hats—philosopher, economist, historian, political theorist, sociologist, and journalist. But his most famous is the revolutionary socialist, and his fame blossomed with his writing and publishing of the Communist Manifesto. He is cited as one of the principal architects of modern social science.

One of his most famous quotes is:

 

“Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people.

 

Marx obviously had pity (and disdain) for religion and the people who he labeled “religious.” (Out of curiosity, all of you religious types who feel oppressed, heartless, spiritless, and drugged, please raise your hands!)

My religious life is the polar opposite of his definition. On the contrary, I feel most oppressed by the world. And my spirit sores the most when I am thinking about and interacting with God. It is faith that brings spirit to a dying, depressed world. It is the hope in the midst of pain and suffering. It is the love given to us by the Almighty that really makes the world go round.

Another famous Marx quote is:

 

“The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.”

 

And change the world Marx did!

He and the German philosopher Friedrich Engels focused on class struggle and believed society would eventually develop from one of oppressing the bourgeois—materialistic, conventional-thinking middle class, a result of capitalism—to a socialist, classless society. And he wasn’t a fan of religion. He felt that the ruling classes primarily used it to oppress the non-ruling ones.

If you allow me to perch myself on my soapbox for a minute, it sounds a lot like the progressive ideology being touted right now. And ironically, it is the powerful and moneyed that are preaching it to the masses—the beauty, happiness, and contentment of a classless society, with them in charge! (Of course you need someone in charge, since the masses aren’t smart enough to make decisions for themselves.)

Something I find ironic is that Marx seemed to abhor the idea of the state controlling the masses, snooping into people’s lives and trying to control them, contrary ideas, beliefs and writings being perused and punished. Because that’s exactly what modern Communism does.

Marxism is a philosophy that won’t die. It keeps being re-fashioned and renamed for the next generation. Keep your eyes and ears open for Marxist ideas being spread in the press, and by politicians, policy makers, and social scientists.

 

Homework:

Take a few minutes to Google how many socialist countries there were at the beginning of the 1800’s. Then fast forward to today. What kind of influence has Marxism had on the world?

And what kind of effect has it had on the people in the countries where it has become the political rule of law?

For deeper thought—

How do you think you would function under a Communist government? Would you be better or worse off? What rights that you now enjoy would you probably lose? (This might require some research, but it will be worth the effort.)

“Don’t become so well-adjusted to your culture that you fit into it without even thinking. Instead, fix your attention on God. You’ll be changed from the inside out. Readily recognize what he wants from you, and quickly respond to it. Unlike the culture around you, always dragging you down to its level of immaturity, God brings the best out of you, develops well-formed maturity in you” (Romans 12:2, The Message).

 

NEXT WEEK: Real-time philosophy, and meditating on the miraculous

 Until then,

Happy thinking!

Andrea

 Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will” (Romans 12:2, NIV).

Are You Mostly Body or Mostly Spirit? Part 1

I am not a human being on a spiritual journey,

I am a spiritual being on a human journey.

 

While studying my Camino de Santiago guidebook by John Brierly (the one I’m using as my primary guide for the pilgrimage the engineer and I will soon embark on), I came upon the above quote, about not being a human being on a spiritual journey but a spiritual being on a human journey.

 

Profound?

It sure sounded deep, spiritual, enlightening, and inspirational when I read it. But then I really started thinking about it, and I came to the conclusion that I don’t fully agree with it.

The quote is a paraphrased and personalized spiritual maxim based on a quote attributed to both Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and G. I. Gurdeiff. Well-known author Wayne Dyer popularized it and evidently uses it in his presentations. It can be considered a paraphrase of the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s dictum that matter is spirit fallen into a state of self-otherness.

 

True, or false?

You can find a lot of psychoanalytic assessment and articles online on the idea of “otherness,” but a rough definition would be to say that it is a state of being different and alien to the self.

And that’s what hangs me up about this saying and causes me to ask myself the following questions:

  1. Am I mostly human, or mostly spirit?
  2. Is my human form less important than my spirit?
  3. Does my soul feel alien to my physical self, and vice versa?
  4. What’s God’s opinion about this view?

 

A few of my conclusions—

  1. Being mostly spirit sounds Gnostic to me.

(We’ll be covering Gnosticism in a future Meditation Monday post.) Gnostics are heavy on spirit and having an “inward knowing.”

  1. God created us to be both spirit and bodies.

And when He originally created humans, He intended for them to live forever, in perfect bodies that didn’t wear down, break down, get sick, or die. The ugly—sinful degradation part—came at the fall. So the original intent seemed to be a nice balance of both body and spirit.

  1. Body and Spirit are equally important.

Since Scripture says we’ll eventually have new bodies in which to house our incorruptible spirits (after death and our resurrection), it seems as though both body and spirit are important to Him—now and later.

  1. Do I have a healthy balance with both?

It seems to me that, in order to live the fullest and most fruitful life, you need to have a healthy opinion toward both your body and soul.

 

Food for thought—

Throughout the summer we’ll be exploring this body versus spirit idea more carefully. But for this weekend, I invite you to mediate on the following questions:

  1. What is your opinion about this spiritual maxim, or philosophical view?
  2. In your life, do you focus more on your physical body or your spirit?
  3. Are your decisions driven more by your physical needs than your spiritual ones?
  4. Which do you believe you need more work on—your body or your spirit? Or do you feel you are living a life in balance, so both the body and spirit are growing and bearing fruit?

 

Until next week,

Happy journeying, with both body and soul!

Andrea

May you prosper in all things and be in health, just as your soul prospers (3 John 2).

Photo courtesy of Andrea A. Owan